My interest in bureaucracy is for the perceived phenomenon: when we feel that processes, rules and controls inhibit our work and the accomplishment of our goals.
I am not interested in definitions and root causes: i want shortly highlight that we can handle both the perception and what is real beyond it.
[Verify]. Accordingly to my experience, in a large enterprise the main cause of bureaucracy is the lack of information. Too many times we think to deal with a process or rule, but it is no more valid. Speed of change does not help: if a guideline change every year – or even faster – it’s difficult for everybody remain updated.
[Negotiate]. Processes and rules call by definition for exceptions: what is useful in most cases, is not useful in all cases. But handling exceptions needs the proper knowledge: first point, do you know who is the owner of the rule, or whoever can help you ? In complex organizations it can be difficult to address the right persons.
[Adapt]. Many times a given rule is necessary: the best way to address it is … accept it. Rules and processes call for routines: the best case to experiment the learning curve – I can change the way I perform activities and become faster and more effective.
[Take Ownership]. People often prefer complain with bureaucracy rather than stay informed about processes and their owners or learn smarter ways to perform repetitive activities. Indeed, almost nobody try to improve processes with suggestions and new ideas – “it’s a waste of time”.
This brings to the last point: sometimes we produce bureaucracy. When we are not flexible enough, when we try to shrink from extra work and responsibilities, when we are tired or annoyed, when we refuse to change …
Ok, i think my idea is clear: bureacracy can be a state of mind, and we can do a lot by ourselves to fix it.
[The idea for this post came from an on line self study available on the intranet of the company I work for: the importance of good reading !]
[marcopergioco/international]